IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Zeus Load Balancer
KevinYeandel
post Feb 8 2010, 07:22 AM
Post #1


Power User
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 114
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Macclesfield,UK
Member No.: 1,389



Hello

Before someone kindly points out to me "ITS NOT SUPPORTED!" - this I know.

My question is:

Has anyone implemented Zeus Load Balancers in a 6.5SP2 config?
So far everything works with this project but has anyone run into any odd problems at all with this software load balancer, e.g. under system load or any add-on/third party products that go pear shaped?

Many thanks

Kevin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
johnnygee_va
post Feb 8 2010, 01:17 PM
Post #2


Other Worldly
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 8-July 03
From: Washington DC
Member No.: 21



Hi Kevin,

Load balancing normally doesnt impact the system. What is the problem you are having? I have used F5 load balancer for many clients and the only thing you have to do is configure "sticky" sessions, such that a client will always go to the same physical server after the initial connection. I presume Zeus would have similar feature that you would have to configure as well.

-Johnny


QUOTE (KevinYeandel @ Feb 8 2010, 09:22 AM) *
Hello

Before someone kindly points out to me "ITS NOT SUPPORTED!" - this I know.

My question is:

Has anyone implemented Zeus Load Balancers in a 6.5SP2 config?
So far everything works with this project but has anyone run into any odd problems at all with this software load balancer, e.g. under system load or any add-on/third party products that go pear shaped?

Many thanks

Kevin



--------------------
____________________
Johnny Gee
Principal Architect
Beach Street Consulting
Blog: http://johnnygee.wordpress.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KevinYeandel
post Feb 9 2010, 07:50 AM
Post #3


Power User
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 114
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Macclesfield,UK
Member No.: 1,389



QUOTE (johnnygee_va @ Feb 8 2010, 01:17 PM) *
Hi Kevin,

Load balancing normally doesnt impact the system. What is the problem you are having? I have used F5 load balancer for many clients and the only thing you have to do is configure "sticky" sessions, such that a client will always go to the same physical server after the initial connection. I presume Zeus would have similar feature that you would have to configure as well.

-Johnny


Hi Johnny

We're not having any problems. Its set up for sticky sessions and configured out of the box but the customer is working with their partner to implement a more complex system with more throughput and addons.
I'm just a bit wary of people building systems with bits of the architecture built on stuff EMC don't support. I'm sure in many cases EMC can't test every architectural scenario which may be the only reason a component isn't supported.

I recall one customer had a supported shared F5 that was dropping frames effecting a WT application.

Thanks for your feeback/advice re. the Full Text types issue.

Kevin

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
johnnygee_va
post Feb 9 2010, 12:40 PM
Post #4


Other Worldly
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 8-July 03
From: Washington DC
Member No.: 21



You're right about your concerns, but like you suggested, EMC cant test (nor certify) every piece of software/hardware that is part of IT infrastructure. Its up to the client to test this out before deploying to PROD environment. I had a customer whose antivirus software was wreaking havoc on customized WT.

Good luck,
Johnny

QUOTE (KevinYeandel @ Feb 9 2010, 09:50 AM) *
Hi Johnny

We're not having any problems. Its set up for sticky sessions and configured out of the box but the customer is working with their partner to implement a more complex system with more throughput and addons.
I'm just a bit wary of people building systems with bits of the architecture built on stuff EMC don't support. I'm sure in many cases EMC can't test every architectural scenario which may be the only reason a component isn't supported.

I recall one customer had a supported shared F5 that was dropping frames effecting a WT application.

Thanks for your feeback/advice re. the Full Text types issue.

Kevin



--------------------
____________________
Johnny Gee
Principal Architect
Beach Street Consulting
Blog: http://johnnygee.wordpress.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BTMsoftware
post Feb 10 2010, 08:59 AM
Post #5


Other Worldly
*******

Group: Root Admin
Posts: 1,454
Joined: 23-July 03
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 147



QUOTE (johnnygee_va @ Feb 9 2010, 01:40 PM) *
You're right about your concerns, but like you suggested, EMC cant test (nor certify) every piece of software/hardware that is part of IT infrastructure. Its up to the client to test this out before deploying to PROD environment. I had a customer whose antivirus software was wreaking havoc on customized WT.

Good luck,
Johnny


Johnny,

which anti-virus was it (in case I come across it one of these days) ?


--------------------
And to quote one of my heroes in this forum:

RTFM for DCTM is:
All documentation is available via EMC Powerlink... you should use your support login.... or get one of your co-workers to download all the manuals
http://www.emc.com/support-training/suppor...c-powerlink.htm

Content_Server_53_SP1_api_ref.pdf {API ref, 5.3.x version, technically not supported in 6.x but is for legacy reasons}
Documentum_6.5_DQL_Reference.pdf
Documentum_6.5_Object_Reference.pdf
Content_Server_6.5_Administration_Guide.pdf
Content_Server_6.5_Fundamentals.pdf

For Web Development
WDK_6.5_Development_Guide.pdf
WDK_6.5_Deployment_Guide.pdf
WDK_6.5_Tutorial.pdf
Webtop_6.5_Deployment_Guide.pdf

Then install WDK & Webtop.... It will be your best resource for finding features that do stuff similar to what you want.... if you see it then examine the source and take what you need. The code in webtop is comment stripped, so I prefer to use WDK code, which is the same but is much easier to read and
much better to work with and upgrade to a newer version

--------------------

Francois Dauberlieu
BTM Software Europe

http://www.btmsoftware.eu
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
johnnygee_va
post Feb 10 2010, 01:29 PM
Post #6


Other Worldly
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 8-July 03
From: Washington DC
Member No.: 21



It was Symantec, but the problems were due to how the customer was customizing UCF.

QUOTE (BTMsoftware @ Feb 10 2010, 10:59 AM) *
Johnny,

which anti-virus was it (in case I come across it one of these days) ?



--------------------
____________________
Johnny Gee
Principal Architect
Beach Street Consulting
Blog: http://johnnygee.wordpress.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th September 2010 - 03:51 AM